• HOME
  • CLUBS
  • NWFCC LEAGUES
  • YOUR FED
    • Everything about NWFCC
    • Mileages Between League Clubs
    • NWFCC HONOURS BOARD
    • Handicapping in the NWFCC
    • NWFCC Documents
  • WHO’S WHO
  • COACHING
    • Croquet Coaching for You
    • Association Croquet
    • Golf Croquet Videos
    • Croquet Magic
    • Croquet “Matches of the Day”
    • Northern Croquet Academy
  • EVENTS
    • NWFCC LEAGUES
    • North West Festival of Croquet
    • National Inter Club Croquet Tournaments

Croquet in the North West

North West Federation of Croquet Clubs - for everything Croquet in the north west

You are here: Home / Oldies Raise Over £700 in Croquet Marathon at Pendle

Oldies Raise Over £700 in Croquet Marathon at Pendle

30 March 2014 by Roger Schofield

The quartet at the end of 24 hours
The quartet at the end of 24 hours

Was it the Ides of March or the Rite of Spring which brought four players to the lawns at Pendle on the first day of spring? Neither, it was Sport Relief! As part of Pendle and Craven Croquet Club’s recruitment and retention plan, the club decided to engage in a twenty-four hour croquet marathon. Our main purpose, unashamedly, was to promote the club and raise the club’s profile in our catchment area. We reasoned that we just couldn’t arrange a match and expect publicity, but that Sport Relief would give us the platform we wanted and more importantly, it was for a really good cause. Our angle with the press was twofold. First, it was for Sport Relief but from a unique sport, namely croquet and secondly and more interesting for the press, as it turned out, it was four `oldies’ who were undertaking this challenge. We succeeded in getting a half page article with photograph in the Lancashire Evening Telegraph, The Craven Herald, The Barnoldswick Times and The Nelson Leader. As I write this article for the Gazette, the follow up article on the amount we raised, who won, etc., with appropriate photographs, has been emailed to our friends in the press, and we are hoping for similar sized articles in each of the aforementioned publications.

Early Morning Rainbows
Early Morning Rainbows

I know that you can’t wait to hear about the match so on with the report. The game was association croquet, not handicap and not advanced! In order to make it last 24 hours we increased the hoop points by 48 times to 1152 plus 2 peg points, i.e. 1154 up. We could have been playing yet, so we time limited the game to 24 hours. When time was called, Liz Wilson (2.5) Chairman of The North West Federation and Roger Schofield (2) Chairman of Pendle and Craven were leading 260 to Garry Wilson(12) and Paul Rigge(-1) Secretary of the North West Federation with their score of 204. This sounds quite a convincing win for Liz and Roger but they were more than 120 points in front when day light broke, so Garry and Paul were making quite a comeback and things might have been very different with a longer time limit.

Liz and Roger won the toss and elected to play with black and blue. Garry and Paul chose to go second. Kathleen Beech, widow of founding secretary John Beech, sounded the bell for play to commence at noon on Friday. It looked like the game would get of to a good start as Garry hit in on the fourth turn and made a good leave. Sadly for Garry, Roger hit and started a break. On the seventh turn Liz also started a break and went to rover on the first round but after this the scoring slowed down. It was 1:15pm before the Paul/Garry team ran its first hoop. A good excuse from Garry was that the court had been laid out specifically for the benefit of spectators sitting in front of the club house, and nothing was in its normal place and certainly not at right angles to the fences or even the cut of the grass! However, we all agreed that the winter work had paid major dividends and that the grass at Pendle was and is in superb condition in readiness for this year’s tournaments.

Darkness fell around 7pm and the halogen floodlights came on. We had arranged to hire the lights from the Skipton branch of SHC Ltd, an equipment and plant hire company, but they would have none of it and allowed us free use of the equipment – thanks, Johnny! Once the layers of clothing had doubled, even tripled, the drop in temperature became a strange incentive for play to speed up and our scoring rate increased. We are all convinced that Liz never missed a hit in, or a rush for the first nine hours. The fact that we could no longer see beyond the edges of the court may have helped our productivity or it may have been because Roger’s wife Kathryn arrived with the evening meal.

Roger either lining up a peel or sleeping
Roger either lining up a peel or sleeping

By 11:30pm our steady flow of visitors totally dried up. As the night rolled into the early hours our weather log showed a drop in temperature to 2 degrees and sometimes below, with rain like a spring shower alternating with rain like stair rods. It was the hail which arrived when Garry was playing that turned the court white, only to be gone five minutes later. It was around this time that Garry was heard to mutter, “If I have any more bright ideas, just remind me of tonight”. So the Gods of croquet were testing our stamina and as dawn broke they relented and a beautiful still, bright morning unfurled as the sun rose and the moon was still in the sky. It’s amazing how much a roquet echoes at half past five in the morning.

Throughout the night the play was mixed. Liz made the biggest break of 19 hoops. Paul made the next sizeable brake of 15 hoops peeling partner ball through the next 3 hoops unfortunately in the wrong direction. We put it down to disorientation, fatigue and sheer bloody mindedness. Roger then made a 17 hoop break but Paul countered with a 17 hoop break plus 2 peels on partner ball and a 21 point break with 3 peels on Garry’s ball, in the right direction this time. Paul’s break was never bettered in the match.

At 7:15am Garry’s wife Audrey arrived with the bacon sandwiches. She was our first visitor on Saturday, and we started to attract a large number of spectators from around 10:30. Our latest member (social member), Ken Tennant called time at 12 noon. By this time mental fatigue now partnered the physical tiredness as Liz asked what to do with her last stroke. Roger told her to, “Stick it in a corner”, so she went for corner four which was already occupied by Paul’s ball. Rather than capitalize on fatigue and in the true spirit of Sport Relief, Garry and Paul declared their shot, thus ending the game. We raised in excess of £700 pounds for Sport Relief and it is still coming in.

Ken Tennant calls time
Ken Tennant calls time

We have since been told that our score of 464 points scored in 24 hours may be a new world record, taking over from the previous record of 402 set on the 10th and 11th of June 2000 at Crake Valley….unless you know better!

As a club, we do not expect a queue for membership, but we do believe that this exercise will have put us front and centre in our community and may just have intrigued some sufficiently to drop in and try our wonderful game of croquet.

Roger Schofield & Garry Wilson

Further Report from Paul Rigge

Paul Rigge, as part of this year’s BBC Sports Relief fund raising activities was called into service to play Croquet for 24hours at Pendle Club, alongside Roger Schofield, Gary Wilson (who’s Bl***y Daft idea it was) & Liz Wilson.

Pendle *challenged* the Federation officers to play them and raise money so doing, and us all being young & fit didn’t think twice, after all how hard can it be? We used to all attend full weekend parties, didn’t we?

Play started in high spirits and fine dry weather at noon on the Friday and early progress was made despite loads of interaction from both teams (PR/GW vs. LW/RS). At dusk the *floodlights* (four 500watt halogen’s) were turned on so play could continue unbroken, and that’s when nature turned on to; with wind, rain, hail, clear moonlight skies, all being rotated in turn during darkness – it introduced another tactic into the game; ‘break down’ and send oppo out into the rain/hail/colder bits and regain the innings afterwards when that bit of weather had passed!

Food (it’s at Pendle remember), arrived, it seemed every two/three hours to keep our bodies fuelled for this marathon session, and fun and good conversation twix the *out players* kept sprits up through the long dark night – with the assistance of a donated bottle of Calvados when our ‘spirits’ needed topping up.

The current world record (according to the Guinness Book) for number of hoops run in a 24 game, is held by Crake in a match against Southport back in June 2000, the total was 402. By Noon on the Saturday, when the bell was rung (to our relief) to end the *timed game*, we’d managed 464!……but it will not count as the new *official* record, since nobody notified ‘The Book People’ before this event that we were making an attempt. However we did manage to raise more than £800 towards the charity total…smiles all round from us and the club got some great paper coverage.
Details of the sponsorship site, if you wish to contribute ( http://my.sportrelief.com/sponsor/24hourcroquet )

2014, News, Pendle

Golf Croquet Handicap System Changing

26 February 2014 by Don Williamson

Latest Update: 

Details finally appeared on the CA website on 19 March: https://www.croquet.org.uk/?p=golf/gchandicapping

They have changed yet again !!!!!!!


Changes in the Golf Croquet Handicap System for 2014

Don Williamson (member of CA GC Handicap Committee) summarises new situation as at 27 February 2014

Results from play with the handicap system over the last few years have highlighted two significant problems.

  • Using the present handicap system with level play games has produced a situation where the bottom level is becoming log jammed and we have a massive range of abilities on the bottom handicap.
  • Using the present handicap system with handicap play produces players with much lower handicaps than those produced by level play.

The New Lower Handicaps

The first problem shows itself by the best players building up a massive handicap index above the top trigger point of 1000. The solution is quite obvious; introduce some new lower handicap levels so that the gain of points is then restricted as the top player’s handicaps will automatically fall and this is precisely what we have done.

The new handicap levels are introduced; -1, -2 and -3. They will be separated by trigger points 200 apart, setting the trigger point for -3 at 1600. It is not considered that we will need the lowest handicap but its introduction makes the handicap scale effectively open ended at the lower end and the next lower handicap is already there if required. This extension to the range will have no effect on the procedure for completing handicap cards other than an extended matrix has to be used. A copy of the new matrix is given at the end of this memo. The present matrix is still accurate for the range it covers.

It is not the committee’s intention that those with indices over 1200 will retain their present totals but that the most senior players will be allocated with new handicaps and a starting index as below:

Now -2 with index of 1400; Stephen Mulliner, Reg Bamford, Rutger Beiderwellan and William Gee

Now -1 with index of 1200; Mark Avery, Pierre Beaudry, Jacob Carr, Jeff Dawson, Harry Dodge, Martin French, James Goodbun, Howard Cheyne, Rachel Rowe, Tobi Savage and Lionel Tibble.

 Any player with an index of over 1200 and not included in the above list should forward a copy of their card to the Handicap Committee as instructed at the end of this memo. All other players retain their present index and handicap.

 Handicap Play Problems

These came to light whilst looking at actual handicap cards in the exercise to introduce the new handicap levels. The reason it has only recently been noticed is that it affects only a very few of our players. It is the good club player with a present handicap of 0 or 1 who plays both level play and handicap games. Unfortunately there are very few in this category. The problem is probably best understood by taking two actual examples.

A very good club player who takes part in both the national level play circuit and also plays a similar number of handicap games, managed to accumulate over 2200 handicap index points over the years. His 2013 record shows, he played 53 handicap games against opponents with the full range of handicaps, winning 45 of them and gained 370 index points. During the same period he played 68 level games and lost 76 index points. Had we introduced the new lower handicaps, his handicap would have probably fallen to -3 but then it would have been totally out of line with players of similar ability who only play level. He personally agrees his handicap on the extended system should still be 0. The lack of any lower handicaps levels managed to hide this problem.

Similarly we have another good club player who mainly plays handicap Golf Croquet in his own Federation and is not exposed to play in the national level play circuit. He has managed quite legitimately to reduce his handicap to 0 but again agrees that if he compares himself to players on the national circuit he would most likely be a 2. There is just one conclusion that can be drawn from all these figures. Players with the present low handicaps of say 0 or 1 are simply not giving away sufficient additional shots in handicap games to give a fair contest. We must therefore take steps to adjust this balance by increasing the bias against the lower handicap players. With luck this should make handicaps produced by the two formats of the game very similar.

The Solution to the Different Handicap Problems

In trying to solve this problem the Handicap Committee looked for a solution that would only have effect in handicap GC play and only where one or more players with handicaps of less than 4 were involved. Our answer was found by using a concept that has already been very successful in handicap one ball and that is what can be called “Effective Handicap” This is very simple to apply and only changes the number of additional turns that a low handicapper gives to a higher handicapper in GC handicap play, this number being equal to the difference between the two player’s effective handicaps. As all players with handicaps of 4 and above will have an Effective Handicap equal to their actual handicap, it will not affect play where no low handicapper is involved. The Effective Handicap table is given below.

Handicap Effective H/C Handicap Effective H/C

3

2

0

-4

2

0

-1

-5

1

-2

-2

-6

 

 

 

 

 

Taking the example of our player who does not play in the level play circuit; if his handicap is increased from 0 to 2, his effective handicap will be 0 and he will still give away the same number of additional stroke and hopefully will remain stable as a 2 handicap. Our other player will retain his 0 handicap but will give away an additional 4 shots. Whether the above figures are exactly right is of course a matter for conjecture but it is a move in the right direction and a years trial will let us know whether we have gone too far or not far enough.

The Change Over Period

As with the changes caused by the introduction of the new low handicaps, we do not want players to have to spend all next season losing every game to get their handicaps in line with the new system and would advise CA Handicappers to make the step changes in the normal manner. Where handicaps have been gained almost exclusively from handicap play, the following changes should be considered.

0 H/C should become 2 with a starting index of 750, 1 H/C should become 2 with a starting index of 650; 2 H/C should become  3 with a starting index of  500; 3 H/C should become a 4 with a starting index of  475. These are suggested values and the handicapper will have to make his own judgement call if there is some content of level play. If there are specific problems, Bill Arliss has agreed to act as the senior CA Handicapper for the Handicap Committee and all details should be sent to bill.arliss@ntlworld.com.

There are in fact some very good mathematical reasons why the effective handicaps are needed to correct an obvious flaw in our old system. For the theoretically minded readers a much more detailed explanation of the changes will be included in a handicapping manual which is being prepared for our web site.

 

The Extended Points Exchange Matrix for Level Play        

                                                  LOSER’S Handicap  

  

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

-3

10

7

4

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-2

14

10

6

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-1

18

14

10

6

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

19

18

14

10

6

4

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

19

19

18

14

10

7

4

3

3

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

19

19

19

16

13

10

7

5

4

4

3

3

2

2

1

1

3

20

19

19

18

15

13

10

8

7

6

5

4

4

3

3

2

4

20

19

19

19

17

15

12

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

4

3

5

20

19

19

19

17

16

13

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

4

6

20

20

19

19

18

16

14

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

7

20

20

19

19

18

17

15

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

8

20

20

20

19

19

17

16

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

9

20

20

20

19

19

18

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

10

20

20

20

19

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

11

20

20

20

19

19

19

17

16

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

12

20

20

20

19

19

19

18

17

16

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

 

 

 

2014, Coaching, Federation, News

Croquet Association Gets View from ‘Up North’

15 February 2014 by Chris Alvey

CA CONSULTATION CONFERENCE ON WORKING PARTY REPORT ON FEDERATIONS

Canalside Sports Complex, Huddersfield.  Saturday 15 February 2014

2014 - Huddersfield Venue for CA ConferenceThe Working Party Report on Federations generated further debate today at a CA organised Consultation Conference at the superb Huddersfield FC sports complex.  Surprisingly, only about 45 delegates attended this event, representing clubs from the North West, North, Yorks and Humberside, West Midlands, East Midlands and East Anglian Federations.  About 14 north west members were in attendance representing: Bowdon; Bury; Chester; Crake Valley; Fylde; Liverpool; Pendle; Southport; Westmorland.

The meeting was led by CA Chairman, Jeff Dawson, assisted by CA Secretary, Dr Ian Vincent and Vice Chairman of Council, Dr Tim King.

Jeff Dawson welcomed everyone explaining this was the second meeting organised by the CA to explain the issues and engage in consultation with clubs, it was not a decision making forum.  He set out the Agenda for the meeting, focussing on: (i) Federations as Members of CA Council; (ii) Federation Boundary Changes; (iii) Fee Structure for Clubs and Players.

Federations as Members of CA Council.

The current constitutional position allows for Federations to elect a person to serve on CA Council who then becomes a ‘Club Representative’ rather than a Federation representative.  These ‘Club Representatives’ make up one third of Council and means Federations are completely independent of Council.  The proposed change in the Constitution would simplify election procedures and change these ‘Club Representatives’ to ‘Federation Representatives’.

Whilst it was stressed that in practice, this alteration would not change anything, it has to be recognised some Federation independence would be lost and there is always the possibility of unintended consequences.  The discussion ranged from the logical need for more integration, advantages of full independence (especially when bidding for Grants), advantages of closer links to Council, more coherent framework for the development of Croquet, the status of clubs within Federations.  One interesting idea emerged that if Federations became affiliated to the CA, this could lead to a practical solution.

A straw poll indicated a majority in the room favoured constitutional change.

Federation Boundary Changes

The nine Federations vary significantly in size ranging from 41 clubs to 8 clubs.  This situation creates differing opportunities for competitive play resulting in some clubs becoming members of more than one Federation in order to participate in appropriate level and quantity of league play.  Issues of representation were discussed, should larger Federations have more places (or votes) on Council?  Is the balance on Council equitable?

The meeting seemed to agree the issue needed addressing but could be progressed by the CA facilitating discussion and negotiation between Federations.

Fee Structure for Clubs and Players

At present 57% of CA income is derived from individual tournament members (paying about £40 each, totalling £56,000) in addition to a levy imposed on CA tournament fees (£13,000).  The remaining £46,000 is generated from clubs paying about £8 per playing member.  Whilst there is no intention to increase revenue streams the long term trend is a reducing tournament income, consequently the WP proposals are attempting to change the balance between the income streams and at the same time reduce barriers to players entering tournaments.

Whilst the number of players entering CA tournaments has decreased, the number of Federation tournaments and league games has increased.  Delegates highlighted the high cost of travelling and subsistence when entering national weekend tournaments, (notwithstanding family commitments), compared to the low costs of local one day competitive league play.

Over lunch, delegates, in four groups, discussed these financial issues including increasing the club player levy and the concept of a levy on all competitive games in Federations (Pay to Play concept).

The majority of delegates supported the strategy of making all club players, members of the CA,  through replacing the individual tournament member fee by an increased club levy on members.  A strong viewpoint emerged that since every club member benefits from the CA infrastructure so everyone should pay for it.  It is estimated club individual membership fees would need to increase by about £10pa to cover this.  Whether this should happen in one step or be introduced gradually caused much debate but conference seemed to favour the one step approach.  Pleas also emerged that the CA should spend more on Development and be more active in marketing the Association.

There was concern in the room about whether there should be a differential levy depending on the status or size of clubs.  However, one small club stated they were in favour of the one step approach and would use a fund raising event to pay for it rather than increase membership fees.

A proposal that clubs should pay their individual member levies to Federations, who then paid the CA, received no support; clubs not having any problems about paying the CA in addition to paying their Federation Membership Fees separately.

The concept of Pay to Play received no support if applied to Federation league games but some limited support if applied to Federation tournaments.  Jeff Dawson also reported that at club level, the concept was probably now a ‘non starter’.

If all players became CA members, they would each be entitled to receive the Croquet Gazette, increasing its circulation to about 6000.  Whilst this could generate increased sponsorship or advertising income, there would be significant increases in distribution (postage) costs.  There were positive suggestions about offering the Gazette both electronically as well as hard copies, even if members had to pay extra for hard copy.  It was also pointed out there would be increased VAT expenditure if the Gazette was distributed by email.  It was also suggested that a ‘News and Article’ website could be set up,  updated on an ongoing basis, as opposed to a bi-monthly magazine format.

Jeff Dawson brought the meeting to a close, stressing the need for further consultation and invited clubs to convey the views of their members to him over the next few weeks.  He also stressed the next steps would be to offer every club and every CA member a vote on each of the separate proposals – only after this exercise would a ‘roadmap’ be designed for consideration by CA Council and AGM in November.

Tony Thomas (Personal Interpretation of Meeting)

 

 

2014, Croquet Association, Federation, News

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 185
  • 186
  • 187
  • 188
  • 189
  • …
  • 271
  • Next Page »

Find a Category

Search Box

Webmaster – Chris Alvey (webmaster@croquetnw.co.uk)

Copyright © 2020 · North West Federation of Croquet Clubs